Governance Analytics

Measures openness and public access to government information and decisions.

With only four deeds tagged under transparency, the score reflects a neutral stance on public access to information. The limited data on public statements and disclosure frequency contributes to this score.

Tracks responsiveness to public oversight, case filings, and vote participation.

The absence of votes and cases filed indicates a lack of public accountability mechanisms, resulting in a neutral score. The high number of deeds tagged with accountability does not translate into active public engagement.

Evaluates effectiveness in delivering public services across key sectors.

The majority of deeds (49 out of 63) are positively rated, indicating effective service delivery, particularly in health and social services. This strong performance is reflected in the high score.

Assesses governance integrity based on corruption risk indicators and procurement transparency.

With only one procurement deed and no cases filed, the data is insufficient to assess corruption risk effectively, resulting in a neutral score.

Measures citizen engagement through votes, comments, and community interaction.

The participation rate is alarmingly low at zero votes per deed, indicating a significant decline in public engagement and interaction with governance processes.

Evaluates lawmaking effectiveness, administrative actions, and policy implementation.

The presence of 15 lawmaking deeds with a positive rating contributes to a solid score, reflecting effective legislative actions despite the lack of public votes.

Tracks government actions impacting education, health, social welfare, and environment.

With a reasonable number of deeds in health and social services, the index reflects a commitment to human development, although the low number of education and environment deeds limits the overall impact.